|
Home |
Search |
Administrative
Add
Build All |
E-911 system improves with age
- By Nancy Remsen -- Free Press Staff Writer
WILLISTON -- With a single keystroke, Jessica Cucinelli connects with a caller who dialed 911 and simultaneously sees on her computer screen the caller's telephone number, address and a list of nearby fire, police and ambulance services.
On a second screen, a map appears. A flashing dot shows this call is coming from a residence next to a body of water.
"Vermont 911. What is your emergency?" Cucinelli asks with a calm professionalism that comes from 3 years of working on the front lines of the state's emergency telephone response system.
"I'm looking across the lake and there appears to be a camp on fire," the caller replies.
Even before asking for the caller's location, Cucinelli knows the lake is Maidstone in the state's northeast corner. She verifies the caller's lakeside address and telephone number and takes the caller's name. Then she asks for information about the fire. The caller says flames are visible from the windows.
"Stay on the line with me, please," Cucinelli says as she hits another key to connect with the dispatcher for the nearest fire department in Groveton, N.H. There's a brief, three-way conversation about how to reach the burning structure, then Cucinelli disconnects to answer another 911 call.
For the past five years, Vermonters, no matter where they live, have been able to dial 911 and, within an average of four seconds, connect with trained call-takers and a sophisticated computer network that speeds help to them in emergencies.
Public safety personnel agree the consumer-friendly system has operated without major glitches, even as it strives to keep up with development and changing technology. The public's growing use of wireless telephones, for example, poses one of the big challenges.
The system was turned on Nov. 17, 1998, and replaced a hodgepodge of local emergency telephone numbers. Nine, soon to be 10, call centers work together to handle nearly 200,000 emergency calls a year.
"It has made a big difference," said Lamoille County Sheriff Roger Marcoux. "It is just so much quicker for people to get emergency service."
There were skeptics when the system was conceived. Doug Brent, South Burlington fire chief and president of the Coalition of Fire and Rescue Services, says some emergency responders worried that centralized call-taking would create delays.
"A lot of people thought with 911 we were adding a step," Brent recalled, noting that call-takers at most centers gather information and pass it on to other people who then dispatch the local police, firefighters and ambulances. "How is this going to make it quicker?" some wondered, but Brent said, "The switch is like nano-seconds."
Now the growing popularity of wireless telephones has created challenges -- from less precision in determining a caller's location to over-utilization of the emergency dialing code by motorists calling in the same accidents. A month ago, the staff at Brookside Nursing Home in Bradford couldn't get through to call-takers in Williston when they sought an ambulance for a patient in cardiac arrest.
"It was unusual," said Dorothy Ruderman, nurse and administrator at the nursing home. "It rang and rang and no one answered." Her staff called the Upper Valley Ambulance Service in Fairlee directly.
John Vose, administrator for the ambulance service, said that was the third time in recent months his service received a direct call because people failed to get quick responses using 911. Each time the explanation was call-takers overwhelmed by reports of the same accidents.
"If it is a trend, or the beginning of a trend, we ought to look at how to fix it," Vose said. A new call center opening at the State Police office in Derby early next year is expected to reduce the number of calls going into Williston.
Evelyn Bailey, executive director for the Enhanced 911 Board, which oversees the systems, says the network is up to the challenges.
"From a straight technology perspective, the system has worked flawlessly since we turned it on," she said. "The service has absolutely met overall expectations," she added, "but we are always trying to raise the bar and increase the quality of the service we provide."
"What this is about is saving lives and property," Bailey said. "We can't do anything less than provide the best technology and the best people to serve the public."
Front lines
Lamoille County developed the state's first 911 system in 1978. Within a year, residents of every town in the county could dial 911 and speak to a dispatcher at the Hyde Park headquarters of the Lamoille County Sheriff's Department.
The Lamoille Sheriff's Department continues to operate a 911 call center, as do five other communities in the state. The other centers are associated with State Police field offices; the largest is in Williston.
The statewide system operates on an annual budget of $2.4 million. Vermont telephone users make monthly contributions to the Universal Service Fund to cover this cost.
Vermont has an "enhanced" 911 system, which means it offers more than the easy-to-remember, universal emergency dialing digits -- 911 -- for all phones.
Through the magic of computer technology and a lot of work changing addresses throughout the state, incoming calls are matched with phone records so the people answering the 911 calls instantly see on a computer screen the addresses and information regarding the nearest emergency service providers. Phone companies update their information daily, feeding it to Verizon, the host for the system.
In the past year, the 911 system has added map data covering the entire state. Phone numbers have been matched with locations on digital maps, so when calls are answered, close-up diagrams of streets and other landmarks pop up on a second screen at the call-takers' consoles. With the tap of a key, the map switches to an aerial photo of the location.
All the centers are staffed with certified call-takers who have been trained in telephone-answering skills, use of computer equipment and emergency first aid. Each call-taker has at hand a set of manuals with the protocols for fire, police and medical emergencies.
"Basically, we are the first person on the scene," said George Spoerl, a veteran call-taker for Lamoille County. He pulled the medical manual from the shelf on his console and said, "If someone calls us up with chest pains, we have key questions."
Bailey said the training and the standardized protocols are critical to ensure proper responses in tense situations.
"This is a tough job," she said. "You don't know what the call is. You could be listening to a murder. You could have a frantic mother whose baby isn't breathing," she said. "These people are very skilled to use their voice to help people calm down so they can get the information that is needed to help them."
Cellular challenges
Snow and sleet caught motorists by surprise last week, producing a flurry of 911 calls about cars sliding into ditches, telephone poles and other vehicles. In the midst of these emergencies, Cucinelli answered a call but found no one on the line.
She didn't hang up. "If you can't speak, press any key," she said. Nothing happened. She listened intently. "We have to determine whether or not it is an emergency."
Sometimes people in life-threatening situations such as a domestic assault or robbery dial 911 and leave the phone off the hook. Other times medical crises prevent people from doing more than dialing. In one well-publicized incident in 1999, a young woman died after she dialed 911 but did not speak. The line disconnected. A call-taker dialed back, but got no answer, then passed the information to a state police dispatcher. The dispatcher also made numerous calls, but failed to send a trooper to check out the situation.
The young woman's parents found her dead. A state medical examiner ruled she had died instantly and no one could have saved her, but her parents filed a lawsuit charging negligence. It was later dismissed.
The controversy demonstrated the need for follow-up on abandoned calls.
Back in the Williston call center, Cucinelli pressed a key on her computer to produce a high-pitched noise from the silent caller's cellular phone. She heard people talking and one said, "What's that?" Still no one came on the line. She hit the key again.
A man picked up and Cucinelli explained she's a 911 call-taker. The man wondered why she called and she said the emergency speed-dial button on his phone must have been pressed. He told her the phone was in a bag. She asked if he had an emergency. He said no. They disconnected.
Spoerl said this happens all the time. He calls them pocket calls.
"They increase in the winter," he said. His primary service area includes two ski resorts, Stowe and Smuggler's Notch, which attract lots of visitors carrying cell phones. The 911 speed dial button is pushed accidentally, he said, "and you hear them laughing on the lift."
Accidental calls are just one of the challenges posed by the increasingly popular cellular telephones. In 2002, 40 percent of all 911 calls came from wireless telephones that weren't tied to any address.
Federal law and regulations require wireless telephone companies to upgrade their technology so enhanced 911 systems will be able to hone in on a caller's location. The systems are ready, but the age of a hand set will determine if a caller's phone provides the critical information.
The oldest cellular telephones transmit no information about a caller's location; a subsequent generation of phones provide data about the transmission tower nearest to the caller.
Many of the newest phones are equipped with global positioning chips, said Richard Enright, director of engineering for Verizon Wireless in New England. "They allow the system to find you within 50 feet."
Bailey says cellular callers will continue to need to know where they are when they call 911. Even if their telephone has the latest technology, she said, "there are going to be reasons why we won't get good location information. Wireless technology is a radio. It is subject to all the limitations of radio signals."
Cellular benefits
Wireless telephones have provided their owners with a fast link to the 911 system, no matter where they are.
Sheriff Marcoux said cell phones allow emergency responders to move much more quickly in cases of missing hikers and skiers. "We don't have to wait three to four hours to see that they are lost," he said. "These people are calling when they feel they are lost."
Motorists with cellular phones have also become the eyes for emergency services on back roads and state highways -- but there's a downside.
On one of last week's inclement afternoons, motorists used cellular phones to pepper the Williston call center with reports of car crashes. Cucinelli handled several calls about vehicles in the median of Interstate 91 near Springfield. She tried to sort out whether people were reporting the same or different crashes. It was a challenge.
Brent, in South Burlington, said some emergency responders are called to the same scenes three and four times because of repeated reports from good Samaritan motorists. He and others have talked about using yellow caution tape to wrap up checked-out vehicles "like a Christmas present."
"We are trying to do something that makes it extremely obvious," he said, "that it is a car that has been checked."
New horizons
Bailey said people often ask her what is left to do, now that the E-911 system is up and running.
"As long as people are continuing to build new structures, as long as technology is developing, there's work left to be done," she said.
Even after five years, some communities have yet to complete matches between addresses and telephone numbers. Where development is brisk, local officials struggle to keep up.
The E-911 board's annual report identified the continuing challenge of phone networks at businesses, schools and resorts. These often fail to provide any information about a call's origin on a campus.
Bailey said the next challenge is to make sure the 911 system links with telecommunications systems in people's computers. She's confident of success.
"We built the system with the future in mind," she said.
Contact Nancy Remsen at 229-9141 or nremsen@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com
Origin of the 50-percent rule hazy but unlikely to affect popular vote outcome
- By Brent Hallenbeck -- Free Press Staff Writer -- Thursday, November 07, 2002
MONTPELIER -- Perhaps it was a concern that the voting public of Vermont wasn't ready for unvarnished, one-man-one-vote democracy.
Perhaps it was a desire to leave the decision of who will run the state in the hands of the state's most trusted, sagacious men.
Maybe it was a matter of mathematics -- if three candidates each earn a third of the popular vote, how can that represent the will of the people?
Whatever reasons the 18th century creators of Vermont's Constitution had, their requirement that some candidates for statewide office receive 50 percent of the vote -- or have their races decided by the state Legislature -- is playing itself out more than two centuries later.
The state Constitution specifies that candidates for governor, lieutenant governor and treasurer receive a majority of the public vote. Usually, but not always, legislators choose the candidate with the most votes.
With Jim Douglas and Brian Dubie failing to receive more than half of the vote for governor and lieutenant governor, respectively, they must wait until the new Legislature takes over in January to find out for sure that they won their races. Because the runners-up said they don't want to be vaulted over the front-runners, the vote by the Legislature should have all the drama of a rubber stamp.
Vermont and Mississippi are the only two states that require candidates to earn more than half of the vote total, said Tim Storey of the National Conference of State Legislatures. The other 48 states require only that a winning candidate receive more votes than his opponents -- not necessarily more than half of those cast. Vermont is the only state that allows legislators to vote for candidates in secret.
Mississippi's rule, from 1890, was seen as an attempt by post-Reconstruction-era legislators to ensure that blacks would not be elected to statewide office. The origin of Vermont's 50-percent rule is more noble than that.
Peter Teachout, a professor of law at Vermont Law School, said the rule reflects a late 18th-century attitude that legislators were the wisest, most virtuous members of their communities who could be trusted to make momentous decisions.
The rule might also reflect that era's general distrust of raw, popular democracy. "The idea of one man and one vote is a philosophy that comes into its own really in the middle of the 20th century," Teachout said.
State archivist Gregory Sanford said the 50 percent rule was common in other states in the 1700s. Vermont previously included the statewide positions of attorney general, auditor and secretary of state in that rule. Sanford said there are no records of what was going through the minds of those who approved the Constitution in 1793.
"Obviously it's, 'How do you determine what is the will of the people?'" Sanford said. He said early legislators must have wanted a mechanism for a more definitive result if three candidates each received 33 percent of the popular vote.
Some legislators said before Election Day that they would make their votes on this year's races public. The Constitution requires that the vote be taken by "joint ballot" of the full Legislature.
"That has always been understood to be by secret ballot," Teachout said, much as votes by the public are secret. He said that lets legislators vote free of party pressure, fear of retaliation or hope for reward.
Teachout said Vermont's continued attachment to the majority requirement might be a passive act, not an active one.
"I don't think it's an expression of Vermont cussedness or independence," he said. "I just don't think anybody felt the pressure to do anything about it."
Sanford cited three unsuccessful efforts in the past quarter-century to change the 50 percent rule, and he expects another attempt in the Legislature in light of this year's election. That could include a proposal for "instant runoff" voting allowing voters to rank their choices in order so elections officials could determine which candidate has the most support.
Contact Brent Hallenbeck at 660-1844 or bhallenb@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com
Recycling to get simpler; setting it up is complicated.
- By Matt Sutkoski -- Free Press Staff Writer -- Thursday, September 19, 2002 The Chittenden Solid Waste District wants to simplify recycling in the county, but the cost and logistics of the new programs remain complicated.
Instead of separating different types of material into separate bins, residents and business owners would dump a mix of plastic, paper, cans, glass and cardboard into one bin or cart. Machinery would separate the material later. The concept is called single-stream recycling.
Making it easier to recycle could prompt more people to comply with Chittenden County's mandatory recycling law, said CSWD spokeswoman Wendy McArdle.
Residents would be less confused over how to recycle. Businesses would have more space to store recycled material for pickup, no longer needing separate bins.
All this means that less trash will end up in costly landfills and more would be recycled into new consumer products, a primary district goal. Manufacturing goods from recycled products usually costs less and create less pollution than making products from virgin material.
For all these reasons, district officials want to recycle as much material as possible.
Ned Flinn, general manager of City Market, said single-stream recycling might help his business somewhat, but the downtown Burlington grocery store already has recycling down pat. "We have a pretty good system worked out already. We did sort of plan for it when we built the new store. In the old store it was an issue with some of the bins and with storage space," he said.
Single-stream recycling in Chittenden County could also cost more than $2 million to set up. Who pays for what is yet to be settled.
The district has $1.1 million set aside to buy the machinery that would separate all the recycling material for resale. After researching systems through the summer, district officials have settled on a company called Machinex for the system.
The district has to come up with another $750,000 to modify a Williston building called a materials recovery facility to house the machinery.
"We're trying to find funds for the MRF expansion," McCardle said.
The most expensive piece of the move is an estimated $1.7 million for about 44,000 large wheeled carts to be distributed to homes and businesses throughout the county.
"The question right now is who is going to buy the carts? The district?" McArdle said. "Some board members are wondering if that's appropriate because the real savings are going to come to the haulers."
Under the new system, trash haulers won't have to separate recycling material into separate sections of trucks. Efficiency would improve, costs could go down.
Casella Waste Management Inc. spokesman Joseph Fusco said he doesn't think haulers should bear the cost of the carts.
"While it will make the system more efficient, really for us it would be marginally so, not enough to justify bearing the cost," Fusco said.
Burlington and Westford provide municipal curbside recycling. Other county residents must either contract with a private hauler or bring their trash and recyclables to drop-off centers. Most of the residents who use private haulers would need the special carts for single-stream recycling.
The biggest expenses to trash hauling and recycling is paying the truck drivers and maintaining the trucks. Those costs won't drop significantly under the new recycling system, he said.
Public policy organizations, like the districts, should be the ones who raise money for decisions they believe are for the good of the public, Fusco said.
The district board will discuss Wednesday the matter of who pays for the carts.
If all pieces of the financing, planning and building the single-stream recycling fall into place just right, McArdle said the program could begin next spring or summer.
Some neighbors object to environmental depot
- By Matt Sutkoski -- Free Press Staff Writer -- Monday, September 30, 2002
SOUTH BURLINGTON -- Some neighbors are objecting to a proposed environmental depot in South Burlington where people could dispose of their household hazardous material.
The Chittenden Solid Waste District is seeking approval from state solid waste regulators to open the depot off Airport Parkway. The facility has a state land use permit and approval from South Burlington planners.
The environmental depot would replace another depot on Burlington's Pine Street. The district wants to close the Pine Street location because much of the operation is outdoors. The site also lies in the path of the proposed Southern Connector.
The Pine Street depot is a transfer station. Residents and small business owners bring their old paint, used motor oil, household cleaners and other potentially hazardous material. The district then sends the material off for recycling or safe disposal.
Robert Sharpe of Kirby Road said his section of South Burlington is overburdened by sometimes disruptive regional services. A closed landfill, a solid waste district drop-off center and an occasionally smelly sewage treatment plant are nearby.
He worries about traffic and hazardous material stored at the environmental depot. Sharpe said he hopes plenty of neighbors attend a public hearing on the solid waste permit application that is scheduled for Wednesday.
Another nearby resident, Mark Brigham, said he would like the depot proposal scaled back and he objected to the possibility of medical waste at the facility.
Sharpe said traffic and problems at the depot could affect the large number of children in his neighborhood. "There's the strong feeling that's the wrong place for this," he said. "I hope we'll all show up in force and try to demand why this is so important to the city. Our argument is, how does this benefit South Burlington.?"
The entire county benefits, said Wendy McArdle, a spokeswoman for the Chittenden Solid Waste District. The depot would be a safe place for people to get rid of household hazardous waste. The ease of disposing of the material there would discourage people from surreptitiously dumping used oil and other pollutants in yards or down drains, she said.
The medical waste at the depot would be mostly hypodermic needles coming from individual homes and very small businesses, McArdle said. Generators of large quantities of medical waste, such as Fletcher Allen Health Care, dispose of the material elsewhere.
The environmental depot in South Burlington would draw about 25 cars a day. No large quantities of material would be stored at the site, McArdle said. She said the district is careful with its current depot, and has never been fined or punished for improper handling of hazardous material.
The depot would be housed in the district's former biosolids plant. The defunct $4.7 million plant converted sludge to fertilizer but closed in 1995 after 20 months of operation due to malfunctions, odors and other problems. The building has sat nearly vacant since.
The building is the perfect use for the depot because most material would be processed, stored or shipped from indoors, McArdle said. The Pine Street site is mostly outdoors, forcing workers and visitors to toil in inclement weather, McArdle said.
The district owns the South Burlington building, but the city owns the land beneath the structure. The district must work out a lease agreement with the city before it uses the property.
The new depot would cost about $474,000. The money will come from a solid waste district reserve fund and grants, McArdle said.
Contact Matt Sutkoski at 660-1846 or msutkoski@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com